A Christian author's blog, dedicated to hopeful writing and the spreading of beautiful things.
Monday, February 14, 2022
On Shoes, Gloves, and Romance
Sunday, January 2, 2022
Life Updates
Well, in all this time, it is a logical assumption that I have been doing things. (Or, at least, if I haven't been doing things, that I've successfully wasted a whole year.)
Life in General
To start, as I mentioned in my last post, my family moved this summer. They are now living down South, and I still abide in the lands of the North. I'm in a music school at present for a dual degree in Music Performance and Music Education (my primary instruments are voice and piano). I got another new sibling this past summer, and he's very cute and very fat. Pressured by location, I am back to the Novus Ordo grind and in the choir. I live with my best friend and writing confidante, and we have gotten a lot of nonsense and very little writing done thus far with this arrangement. On the side, I teach music, work a pretty effortless desk job, and help direct a high school musical theater group. Those are really the biggest things that are going on at the moment.
Writing
As far as writing goes, I was somewhat productive up until the school year started. The Second Brother is now finished and under critique from beta readers, and the sequel(s) have been started with some headway. I decided to trash My Land, My Heart (the idea was very trite), and my opera's present plot, In Greater Hands, and my Giselle retelling are also prospectively on the chopping block. I wrote some draft ideas for He Travels the Fastest, and I may be writing it in earnest as the next main project. I came up with another archive novel idea (which I will probably expound on in another Meet the Books! at some point).
Probably the biggest thing that happened as far as writing goes was a redraft, though. My writer friends on Camp NaNo may remember that I have a coauthored novel project which has never been talked about on this blog (mainly to respect my coauthor's privacy). Now, however, Grim has her own blog, and I plan to introduce the story via Meet the Books! sometime very soon. In a nutshell, the story was dull, medieval fantasy of a rather cliche type and has been - um - remodeled, shall we say? Very, very remodeled... Anyhow, more on that later.
Reading
It would take all night for me to cover the reading of a year, so I will just touch on some honorable mentions:
The Journal of Hildegard of Bingen, interpreted by Barbara Lachman
- You must read it!
- Don't read my translation because it was terrible. The lady was intent on making St. Hildegard out as some proto-feminist or female priest or something. Her footnotes were beyond weird. Do yourself a favor and find a better version.
- Overall, even with the terrible commentary, it was quite a fascinating look into life in a twelfth-century abbey. St. Hildegard was quite an inspiring woman, too - scientist, singer, composer, doctor, abbess, and mystic, and writer of the first musical, to boot.
- This fabulous book takes the reader through a careful reconstruction of the processes leading to common political thought today in America. She then proceeds to look at each aspect of the philosophy through a Christian lens, with frequent recourse to the Bible, Catechism, writings of the saints and other great Christian authors. Certainly worth reading.
- Okay, guys, you need to know about Beethoven. For better or worse, intentionally or not, this guy created the musical world we live in now. (The musical nerd side of me wants to promote it more, but I think I'd probably better stop before I get carried away.)
- The one huge problem I had with this book was the anti-Catholicism of it all. The author showed rather painfully that she had no competent understanding of Christianity at all. She was quite biased when mentioning anything about the Church, and very strangely positive about every conflicting philosophy except traditional Catholicism. I find this a very high failing when dealing with a composer like Beethoven, who had a complicated and influential relationship with Catholicism. You'd think she would put a little more time and thought into that aspect of the book at least for Beethoven's sake.
- To be perfectly honest, I was actually a bit disappointed by the play. It was not as good as the movie (*gasp*), and the author had a very strange way of looking at St. Thomas's philosophy that didn't really show up in the original movie version.
- All the same, beautiful verse, splendid play. Definitely go watch the Paul Scofield movie.
Sunday, December 1, 2019
The Dex Dangerous Dilemma - A Prompt for Writerly Philosophical Discussion
If any of you grew up in my generation (which... is probably most of my readers), then you probably at least heard of, if not played devotedly, a stuffed animal/computer game called Webkinz World. It featured your little stuffed friends coming to life online and playing games, working jobs, eating delicious-looking food, etc., and it was the darling of many children as I grew up (myself included, even though my mother actually was the one playing the computer part for the majority of the first years... as I absently tended the beloved stuffed animals). I'd stopped playing it for a while and rediscovered it not too long ago, coming back for a few of my favorite games. One Webkinz game I never liked, though, was Dex Dangerous and the Lunar Lugbotz (mostly because I was terrible at it).

This particular game chronicles the constant warfare between Dex Dangerous, an adventurer and astronaut extraordinaire (a lion) and the Lunar Lugbotz, a group of singularly malignant animalian aliens who are bent on destroying Webkinz World's moon, of which Dex Dangerous is the sole defender. In the game, the simple objective is to use Dex to defend the moon at all costs (when the moon gets enough holes in it from asteroids and alien missiles, it drops back onto the surface of Webkinz World).
Alright. This is all well and good, Belle, but where's the point? When are we getting to the discussion prompt? Okay, okay, I'm getting there. So, in the game, Dex is pretty much invincible - while the asteroids and missiles and such can dent and put holes in the moon, they cannot do the same to Dex. It is presumable that he has some sort-of tiny force-field on his ship that prevents them from damaging him as they would the moon. Here, then, is the dilemma (and the point)...
If Dex has a force-field or protection of some kind on his ship, he could as easily put that small defense on the moon. Now, his ship is a good bit smaller than the moon (about an sixth of its size because, you know, Webkinz is extremely realistic), so if he did use the force-field for the moon, it would cover about a sixth of it, but leave him conquerable, as well as the other five sixths of the moon. Now - this would accomplish immediately the first aim of the game, but only by crippling the means slightly. With the means less viable, the other sixths of the moon have less chance of being saved. But one piece of the moon will surely be saved, no matter what. (This is all disregarding physics, by the bye, as we can't have the moon floating out into space in pieces.)

In philosophical terms, the choices for Dex are to accomplish a part of the ends by sacrificing part of the means' effectiveness, or to try his luck with an extremely effective means but no guarantee of getting to the ends. This brings up an interesting moral dilemma, no? Which is the more efficient - to fulfill part, but not all, of the ends directly and hurt the rest thereby? - or to make the means as effective as possible and stake the ends' chances on that? Characters in books and movies and such make such choices all the time, but it is the writers that have to deal with these conundrums.
So here is my prompt, I suppose. Have any of your characters had to choose between means and a mere part of the ends? Or, if you are philosophically-minded, which seems more fitting to the value of the final goal?
If I'm still not making sense, here's another scenario (equally as nerdy). In the first season of Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu, the four main ninja have two goals, the first of which is necessary to accomplish the second: get at least one of the four Fang Blades, and then destroy at least one before the villains can take it back. Now, if one of the ninja had died to acquire a Fang Blade (the first goal), then there would have been one less ninja to fight off the villains and destroy the blade (the second goal). Would this have been counterproductive? Or noble? Or is there an alternative option?

Going back to Dex Dangerous, my sister (much more an expert at the game) assures me that the game would be much harder if Dex was not invincible, even if part of the moon was. If that is the case, then I suppose that would be the logical conclusion. But being easier is not a guarantee of success, nonetheless, and even my sister usually loses the game eventually. Does this mean that it's not easy enough? Or that the other option is more legitimate? Or perhaps it is a paradox altogether?
My own conclusion, I am not sure of. I have my ideas, but I primarily wish by this silly rant to prompt discussion on the dilemma, especially among writers ( who are infamously philosophical), and especially among this particular lovely circle of writers (who are, perhaps, even more infamously philosophical). Answer in a comment, answer in a post, answer in a series of posts, answer in an entire novel, if you like - I would like to hear some good rattling debate about it. Is an effective means more important? Or directly accomplishing any part of the ends? Or is it a chicken and egg scenario?
Whatever your thoughts, however brief or lengthy, I would like to hear them.
Saturday, November 23, 2019
In Greater Hands - Sneak Scene
Monday, October 14, 2019
My Ink-and-Paper Pack...












